Understand the rule first
Good evidence proves the claim directly. Compare candidate quotations, reject general background and choose the detail that would persuade a careful reader.
Select the shortest, strongest textual evidence for an exact claim.
Good evidence proves the claim directly. Compare candidate quotations, reject general background and choose the detail that would persuade a careful reader.
Copying a long sentence about the same topic even when it does not prove the specific claim.
Reusable method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.Choose the detail that shows physical tiredness, not merely activity.
Answer C: ‘She stopped every few steps, struggling to keep her eyes open.’
Stopping repeatedly and struggling to keep her eyes open directly demonstrate exhaustion.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
Look for unfinished activity and disorder rather than age alone.
Answer B: ‘Half-eaten meals remained on the table and one chair lay overturned.’
Half-eaten food and an overturned chair suggest people left in the middle of events.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
The evidence must show both the earlier and later views.
Answer A: ‘At first Arun called the plan impossible; by sunset he was explaining how it could work.’
The contrast between ‘impossible’ and explaining how it could work directly proves a change.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
Choose the detail connecting a familiar signal with a specific response to Maya.
Answer C: ‘At the familiar whistle, the dog raced past everyone else and leapt towards Maya.’
The dog responds to the familiar whistle and singles Maya out, directly supporting recognition.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
Find the changing condition that creates a physical risk.
Answer B: ‘The road narrowed until loose stones crumbled beneath the wheels.’
A narrowing road and crumbling stones directly show increasing danger.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
Choose evidence showing patient behaviour over time.
Answer D: ‘For two hours, Arun waited without complaining or interrupting.’
Waiting for two hours without complaint or interruption directly demonstrates patience.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
Look for unfinished action and a sudden departure.
Answer A: ‘The front door stood open and a kettle was still boiling.’
An open door and boiling kettle suggest the occupants left in the middle of what they were doing.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
Choose the strongest physical change in emotion.
Answer B: ‘Her shoulders relaxed and she began to laugh.’
Relaxed shoulders and laughter are direct behavioural evidence of relief.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
The evidence must show both change and increasing severity.
Answer C: ‘A light drizzle turned within minutes to hail that hammered the windows.’
The shift from light drizzle to hammering hail within minutes directly proves rapid worsening.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.
Find evidence showing both unwillingness and eventual leadership.
Answer D: ‘Lena refused twice, then stepped forward only when nobody else volunteered.’
Refusing twice shows reluctance, while stepping forward when others do not shows that she finally accepts leadership.
Quick method: Compare two possible quotations and choose the more specific one.